Bigfoot: Is it possible that the Sasquatch exists?

pixabay.com

Bigfoot, also known as Sasquatch, would have to be a master of camouflage.

Some think North America is home to a large ape-like creature called Bigfoot, or Sasquatch. A cryptid (species rumored to exist), like the Loch Ness monster or the Chupacabra, there is little evidence to support the existence of Bigfoot. That doesn't deter Bigfoot enthusiasts and reported sightings of the mysterious ape from trying to verify the legend's existence.

The Northwest is home to the majority of reported Bigfoot sightings, where the creature has been tied to local Native American folklore and mythology. According to the Oregon Encyclopedia, the word Sasquatch is derived from the Halq'emeylem language, which some Salish First Nations peoples speak in southern British Columbia. It refers to someone who is "wild" or "hairy."

What was the impetus behind the Bigfoot craze?

A report of a "gorilla-type" monster was published in the British Colonist newspaper in Victoria, Canada, in 1884. According to the Canadian Encyclopedia, further tales followed, many of which were denounced as hoaxes. According to John Green, author of the best-selling Sasquatch book series, there have been 1,340 reports of sightings in the 19th and 20th centuries. However, in the late 1950s, the current Bigfoot or Sasquatch story was given new life.

According to a local California newspaper, there had been an unexplained discovery of enormous and odd footprints near Bluff Creek in 1958. According to Smithsonian Magazine, they called the creature that created them "Bigfoot." After an article in True magazine in December 1959 revealed the discovery of Bigfoot in 1958, interest in the creature skyrocketed in the second part of the twentieth century.

After Ray Wallace's death in 2002, his children confessed that the footprints near Bluff Creek were a hoax perpetrated by their father, according to Smithsonian Magazine. Bigfoot, on the other hand, had already made a name for itself in folklore across North America at that point. Numerous more "proof" claims have been made about Sasquatch after the publication of the 1958 paper.

There have been several reports of Bigfoot sightings.

Bigfoot sightings in the continental United States have been recorded by more than 10,000 people in the last 50 years, according to research by Live Science in 2019. A hairy, 8-10 foot (2.4-3 meter) tall Bigfoot is the most common description in these tales.

The most popular kind of proof of Bigfoot's existence comes in the form of eyewitness reports or sightings. The problem is that these are based on human memories, which aren't always accurate. For example, witnesses can be swayed by their emotions in criminal proceedings, resulting in inaccurate or distorted testimony. In a similar spirit, people frequently exaggerate their memory capacity. Many people desire to believe in cryptids like Bigfoot because of the human brain's ability to invent explanations for phenomena it cannot quickly explain, as Live Science previously documented.

Photographs and video of the cryptid known as Bigfoot

"Patterson–Gimlin film" or "Patterson film" is the most well-known footage of Bigfoot, shot in 1967 by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin. It appears to be Bigfoot or a huge and hairy bipedal ape strolling through a clearing in Bluff Creek. As far as we can tell, the video seems to be a fraud, with the ape-like person being nothing more than a human in disguise.

The sharpness and clarity of images of people, cars, mountains, flowers, sunsets, deer, and more have improved over the years, with Bigfoot being a prominent exception. Photographs of these creatures are either hoaxes or misidentifications, which would explain the disparity.

recordings of sound

As far as Bigfoot sounds go, some people say they've heard shrieks and other types of noise. According to Scientific American, the organisms are also linked to other noises, such as wood-knocking. Media attention is occasionally drawn to strange noise recordings related with Bigfoot that can be attributed to well-known creatures, such as foxes or coyotes.

Strange recordings made by cryptozoologists, persons who investigate the existence of mythical apes, are often difficult for experts to identify. When a video of strange howling and screaming in a wilderness in northwest Ontario, Canada, went viral in 2019, it sparked discussion about the existence of Bigfoot. While it's possible that a more giant mammal—like a wolf—could be heard, "there is no way to know for sure," a spokesperson for Ontario's Ministry of Resources and Forestry told Vice News at the time.

Big Footprints: A Scientific Inquiry Into the Reality of Sasquatch" was written by Grover Krantz, a late anthropologist who analyzed sound recordings believed to be of Bigfoot for his book (Johnson Books, 1992). According to an earlier post by Live Science, he listened to ten cassettes and found "no convincing reason to assume that any of them are what the recorders claimed to be."

evasive and indisputable proof

Bigfoot's existence is based on circumstantial evidence. In his book "Big Footprints," anthropologist Krantz discusses purported Bigfoot hair, dung, skin scrapings, and blood. "The general fate of these artifacts is that they either receive no scientific examination or that the record of that study is either lost or unobtainable," he stated in his paper. Even when adequate examinations have been carried out, the material has frequently been discovered as false, meaning a conclusion couldn't be reached.

Samples claiming to be from Bigfoot are often shown to be from mundane sources when subjected to rigorous scientific testing. According to a geneticist from Oxford University in England, a team of experts conducted genetic analysis on 36 hair samples alleged to belong to Bigfoot or the Yeti—a similar ape-like creature that is said to reside in the Himalayas—in 2014. For example, Humans, raccoons, and cows were the most common hair sources. Although two samples closely matched an extinct Paleolithic polar bear, Live Science said. Whether from a present bear hybrid or a previously undiscovered bear species, these samples came from a bear, not a monkey.

Another reason to reject the existence of Bigfoot is genetics. The reproduction of a single individual can sustain no species. Bigfoot would have a large enough population to avoid inbreeding and poor genetic variety to remain alive. Otherwise, it would go extinct.

No remains have ever been recovered, even though there is more Bigfoot about to raise the risk of one being killed by a hunter, hit by a car on the highway, or even found dead (by accident, disease, or old age) by a hiker or farmer. People have occasionally seen bones and other big body pieces. It's not uncommon for people to find fossilized Bigfoot skulls, such as this one found by a man in Utah in 2013. Previously, Live Science stated that a paleontologist had confirmed that the "skull" was nothing more than an unusually weathered rock.

The Bigfoot hoaxes

The challenge of separating Sasquatch fact from fiction has been made much more difficult by Bigfoot hoaxers. The fabrication of Bigfoot prints, photos, and practically every other piece of evidence has been admitted by dozens of persons or exposed by the authorities. The family of Ray Wallace, who left footprints at Bluff Creek in 1958, has revealed that he was responsible for them. Rant Mullens, who worked as a logger in Toledo, Washington, is an excellent example of an early logger. The Chronicle, a Washington newspaper, stated in 2007 that in 1982 he acknowledged making enormous feet out of wood and used them to make false footprints with the help of a pal in the 1920s. A long time before Wallace's footprints made Bigfoot a household name; there was a mythology of ape-like men who lived in the woods.

Bigfoot hoaxes of the 21st century can be found as well. In 2008, two Georgia hikers claimed to have discovered a frozen specimen of Bigfoot during their search. Reuters reported in 2008 that their Bigfoot suit was a gorilla costume.

An Oklahoma senator, Justin Humphrey, has proposed a Bigfoot hunting season for January 2021. There is an annual Bigfoot festival in Honobia, Oklahoma, and Humphrey suggested that the hunting season may be timed to coincide with this event. A $2.1 million bounty for the capture of a live Bigfoot was later announced by Oklahoma tourism officials in March, according to NPR.

The true Bigfoot.

It may be difficult to find proof of a modern-day Bigfoot in the wild, but a massive, bipedal ape formerly roamed the planet. Based on fossil evidence, a species of Gigantopithecus blacki weighed up to 595 lbs. (270 kg). To be clear, Gigantopithecus did not roam North America but Southeast Asia and died out hundreds of thousands of years ago. Live Science stated that the ancient ape was more closely connected to modern orangutans than humans or our closest relatives, chimpanzees and bonobos.

Additional tools are available.

There has been a slew of novels written about Bigfoot. Check out "Bigfoot: The Life and Times of a Legend" for a critical history of the Bigfoot phenomena (University of Chicago Press, 2010). You can also look into the link between scientists and cryptozoologists and the nature of monster hunting in the late 20th century in "Searching for Sasquatch: Crackpots, Eggheads" (Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).

It's worth reading the Times-Standard if you want to know how Bigfoot became a modern phenomena in the first place and how it got started. It's worth checking out the Cal Alumni Association for information on whether or not monster hunts like the one for Bigfoot are beneficial to science.

Reference : https://www.livescience.com/24598-bigfoot.html

Image source : https://pixabay.com/id/vectors/kaki-besar-yeti-sasquatch-raksasa-6936421/

Is the Sasquatch a real creature?

Sasquatch: Is Bigfoot real?

Is there really a thing as the Sasquatch?

Does Bigfoot exist?